Here Comes The IML Conference. Does the Village Have the Money This Time?
Hopefully this issue has already been addressed for the 2010 IML Conference, but just in case it hasn't... Well its that time of year for village officials across the state to start thinking about going to the IML Conference that's held in downtown Chicago every year around September. The first year I went to this conference as a Richton Park Village Trustee, I drove downtown with my own car, parked the car in a garage, spent a couple nights at The Hilton, took cabs to restaurants and bought some meals. There were some free meals involved, but when I added up all my expenses including mileage, parking, cab fare, hotel and a couple meals, the expense report came up to around $1,000. Now a lot has happened since those heady days of 2007. We found out the village was just about out of cash to the tune of 6 million dollars with spending a million dollars over budget for the prior 6 years. Then comes the economy and housng crashes of 2008 and 2009. The last IML Conference I attended in 2009, I downsized. I think my expense account was less then $100. I didn't stay overnight at a hotel. I took the train downtown, went to my classes for the day. went to one free dinner offered by our engineering firm, then drove home with my wife.
So, that was a big reduction in expenses. I did that because I knew the village was having money problems. I tried to get other board members to follow suit, but those that went did the stay downtown thing again just like we (the Village of Richton Park) had money coming out of our ears. The Village of Olympia Fields doesn't allow village personnel or officials to stay overnight for any downtown Chicago conferences. They're expected to drive back and forth. Its only 35 miles away and driving home at night after rush hour is over only takes 30 minutes. I know because I've doen it. The problem in some instances is alcohol. At most of the after-the-work-day parties there's open bars. People tend to have a few more drinks then they normally do when they're not paying for them. So staying overnight in downtown Chicago at $275 a night becomes a safety issue. But the Village of Richton Park, heck the PEOPLE of Richton Park, shouldn't be picking up the hotel tab. And that's goes for whether or not you're drinking.
The policy should be "the village will not pay for overnight hotel stays for any conference or seminar held within a 60 mile radius of Richton Park." If village personnel and officials want to stay overnight for convienience or for whatever reason, they can do so, but they do so at their own expense. And that sholld be the policy even when the economy comes back, tax revenues are up and the village coffers are full of surplus dollars! Remember, its not your money your spending, its the taxpayers of Richton Park!
Last Updated (Wednesday, 28 July 2010 21:05)
Congratulations Monica Holden!
I can't think of a better person to be appointed to my vacant Trustee seat. Congratulations! Both to Monica and to Richton Park. I met Monica around town at many different functions and she always seemed in tune with what was going on in Richton Park and always concerned about quality of life issues in Richton Park. I know she' sgoing to do a good job for the people of Richton Park and she's got my vote in this spring's upcoming election. (If I could vote in Richton Park, that is!) Good luck Monica!
Trustee Harry Olson Resigns
On May 4, 2010 Trustee Harry Olson sent out the following email:
Dear Village President Reinbold, Board of Trustees, Village Staff and Citizens of Richton Park,
With the recent death of my mother and the sale of my home in Richton Park, I am tendering my resignation as Trustee for the Village of Richton Park effective immediately. After living in Richton Park for the past 33 years, my wife and I will be moving full time to our house in Arizona.
I'd like to thank the people of Richton Park. Its been a great honor serving on the Board of Trustees for the village. Not only do I feel that the makeup of the board has changed for the good, I feel that while I've been on the board we've made some great progress in regards to management staff changes at the village and that our village is now headed in the right direction with the right leadership in place. I'd like to thank all the volunteers I've worked with over the years including the Merchants Chamber, the Lakewood Home Owners Association, the Cable TV committee, the Economic Development Committee and the HOA Day volunteers. I'd also like to thank the people at Park Towers, Lioncrest Town Homes and Cedar Ridge. I very much enjoyed the Diversity dinners. Hope sure throws a good party.
After long time Richton Park business L.A. Café closed its doors last year, I volunteered to help develop and host the Richton Park Business website to aid in business retention. This past year I helped develop the new Village of Richton Park website. I'm sorry I won't be around to see the finished community center.
Finally, I'd like to thank Village President Rick Reinbold and all the hard working staff at the village for all their help and encouragement they offered to me while I was a volunteer and Trustee.
Thank you and good luck Richton Park!
Sincerely,
Harry Olson
Who Should Be Appointed to Trustee Olson's Seat?
By Harry Olson
Let me say, first of all, that this is just my opinion. What's going to happen is beyond me and certainly out of my control!
Let's start out with who should not be appointed. Any one who has previously held the office should not be appointed. In my opinion change is good. I would like to see term limits on public offices held in Richton Park. I proposed this while I was on the Board, but it didn't even get put on the agenda because "why go through all the legal expense when its just going to get voted down anyway". When incumbents say they have the experience or want to see things through, its all a bunch of nonsense. Anybody with half a head on their shoulders can do the job. The village is run by the Village Staff. They do all the work, they put the Board's agendas together and make suggestions as to the path we should take. We have legall consul, finance and accounting people, Parks and Rec, Public Works, Police and Fire. They run, maintain and protect the Village on a day to day basis. When the Board meets two times a month (more when the budget is being worked on), who's not going to vote for the vicious dog ordinance? I don't mean to belittle trustees or the work they do, but again, I think just about any resident can do the job. So no need to appoint somebody who has already been in the job. They've had their chance and if they decided to quit or got voted out of office lets leave it at that and let the village move on. I hope in the upcoming election in Spring 2011 we have 3 new trustees voted in that have no political experience whatsoever.
So who do I think should be appointed? I have a special place in my heart for Richton Park Citizens of the Year. I was one myself and it was nice to be recognized for all the volunteer efforts one does. Some of the more recent Citizens of the Year include Brian Coleman and Bill Colon. Another person I think would be good would be Monica Holden. They all seem to me to have the best for Richton Park in the forefront without any hidden agendas. But hey, that's me. Maybe the seat will remain empty until the election. In any case, I think the Village of Richton Park needs someone new without any hatchets, hidden agendas or devisive old alliances. What we need is someone with a new attitude!
Good luck Richton Park!
P.S. I'm now living in Arizona, so why don't I just keep my big fat nose out of it? Well, I lived in Richton Park for over 30 years and there's still a special place in my heart for the people in Richton Park. The village is moving along in a good direction and I'd hate to see it slip back into two opposing camps arguing with each other all the time. Isn't the internet great? Just like I'm there!
Last Updated (Thursday, 13 May 2010 23:57)
Community Center Ground Breaking
Richton Park had a ground breaking ceremony on Saturday, October 31st for their new Community Center. Scheduled completion will be around the same time next year. Community advocates have wanted a community center in the village for a long time. However, a couple of village wide referendums were defeated years ago that would have increased taxes on residents to build and operate a community center. It just so happens that one of the more successful TIF (Tax Increment Financing) districts in the village has accumulated tax funds over the years. These funds were sitting there until someone reviewing the original TIF documentation discovered a clause that allowed these funds to be used to build a community center! These funds accumulated over many years, so no increases in taxes were required to build the community center.

From left to right is Village Clerk Mary Pierce, Trustee Cynthia Butler, Trustee Valerie Babka, Village President Rick Reinbold, Trustee Julian Alexander, Trustee Sharon Kriha, Trustee Jennifer Artis and Trustee Harry Olson.
Above are the Community Stakeholders plus everyone else that showed up! A good time was had by all! Let's start construction!
Last Updated (Monday, 02 November 2009 03:15)
What makes a good neighbor?Its got nothing to do with State Farm Insurance. Here are some of the things I look for from a good neighbor: Last Updated (Monday, 02 November 2009 01:21) Richton Park in Financial Trouble?Just the other board meeting I tried to save the village about $2,000 a year and was shot down in a ball of flames. Wouldn't you like to have $2,000 you could just burn? The IML (Illinois Municipal League) conference comes to Chicago once a year in the fall and I tried to get the village to stop paying hotel lodging for village board members and staff. Last Updated (Friday, 30 October 2009 05:44) |
State Legislature Update - 10/30/09IML STATE HOUSE BRIEFING “On the ground news and insider information!” 10-30-09 The General Assembly concluded the 2009 Veto Session late Friday afternoon.
Cemetery Bill Stalled: Our last update announced that an amendment was adopted in the House that exempted government bodies from most of the regulatory requirements proposed within SB 1471. The House passed this much more government-friendly bill over to the Senate. The Senate opted not to vote on SB 1471 during the Veto Session. No cemetery reform legislation will be sent to the Governor at this time. It remains possible that the Senate will act on the bill when the General Assembly convenes for one day on January 12, 2010.
Campaign Finance Reform: The General Assembly approved a bill that contains new campaign contribution caps. The General Assembly initially sent campaign finance reform legislation to the Governor during the spring session (HB 7). Despite having supported HB 7, the Governor and the legislative leaders agreed to scrap the bill and begin anew after reform groups criticized the perceived ineffectiveness of the contribution caps. Read more about SB 1466 -- the latest version of campaign finance reform here.
Video Gaming: The House defeated a bill that would have allowed establishments to continue to conduct video gaming for up to 2 years after a local government opted to prohibit gaming. HB 1306 was approved by the Senate but failed to receive sufficient votes in the House.
Next Session Day: The General Assembly is scheduled to return on January 12, 2010. State Legislature Update 10/29/09IML STATE HOUSE BRIEFING “On the ground news and insider information!” 10-29-09 Evening Edition Please find below an evening legislative update for Thursday, October 29.
Cemetery Regulation Agreement: An intense lobbying effort appears to have aided the IML and other groups in securing a partial exemption for government and religious entities in SB 1471. The partial exemption contained in Amendment 3 means that municipalities must adhere to only minimal regulatory requirements. Read more about these requirements here. Following the adoption of the amendment, the House approved SB 1471 by a vote of 89-27. The bill now goes to the Senate.
Pension Relief Dead: The effort to win temporary, short-term budget relief from rising pension contribution requirements is over. No agreement was reached on SB 2011 once the police and firefighter unions refused to allow municipal governments to have at least two years of relief from what are anticipated to be jolting financial obligations. Along with declining municipal revenues, these increases will almost certainly contribute to significant budget shortfalls that can only be closed through staff reductions and service cuts in 2010. Everybody loses here.
Video Gaming: HB 1306 would allow establishments that conduct video gaming to continue to conduct gaming for up to 2 years after: (1) a county or municipality prohibits gaming; or (2) a referendum prohibiting gaming is approved by the voters. The bill was approved by the Senate by a vote of 40-12 and will next be considered by the House.
Prevailing Wage: There has been no movement on SB 43 -- legislation to extend the prevailing wage to all privately-funded projects within an Enterprise Zone. The bill remains on Second Reading in the House.
Foreclosure Bill Sent to Governor: The IML successfully advanced one of our legislative agenda items to the Governor's desk. SB 1894 passed the Senate by a vote of 53-2-3. If signed by the Governor, municipalities would begin to receive information about who actually owns properties that have gone into foreclosure as well as the contact information for the eventual purchaser. The bill would also establish a uniform method for filing liens to recover the costs of removing certain nuisances that contribute to a property falling into a state of disrepair. SB 1894 would ultimately contribute to cleaner and safer neighborhoods.
STAR Bonds: As initially approved by the General Assembly, SB 1909 would create a limited geographical area within which any state sales tax revenue generated would go toward financing bonds associated with an economic development project within the area. The Governor issued an amendatory veto that reduced the share of state sales tax proceeds used to finance the bonds by 50%. An effort is currently afoot to create what can be described as a mitigation plan to protect against lost revenues for those municipalities just outside the STAR Bond area that might see their businesses enticed into relocating within the STAR Bond development area. A legislator involved with the issue informed IML staff that STAR Bond legislation was unlikely to move before the conclusion of the Veto Session on Friday. Failure to accept or override the Governor's Veto means that SB 1909 would die. Last Updated (Friday, 30 October 2009 03:35) |



